BMJ Open · 2022 · 10 citations · 21 references
MedicineOncologyPediatricsAdolescent HealthCancer ControlPediatric OncologyCommunication With FamiliesSupportive Care In CancerFamily Involvement In Decision-makingMedical Decision-making In FamiliesPediatric Shared Decision-makingShared Decision-making With ChildrenTreatment Decision DiscussionsTreatment Decision-making CommunicationTreatment Decision-making Support
OBJECTIVES: To examine treatment decision-making priorities and experiences among parents of children with cancer in Guatemala. SETTING: This study was conducted at Guatemala's National Pediatric Cancer Center in Guatemala City. PARTICIPANTS: Spanish-speaking parents of paediatric patients (≤18 years of age) diagnosed with any form of cancer within the 8 weeks prior to study enrolment. The quantitative portion of this study included 100 parent participants; the qualitative component included 20 parents. Most participants were Catholic or Evangelical Spanish-speaking mothers. OUTCOMES: Priorities and experiences of cancer treatment decision-making including decision-making role and experienced regret. RESULTS: A range of paediatric ages and cancer diagnoses were included. Most Guatemalan parents surveyed (70%) made decisions about their child's cancer together and almost all (94%) without input from their community. Surveyed parents predominately preferred shared decision-making with their child's oncologist (76%), however 69% agreed it was best not to be provided with many options. Two-thirds of surveyed parents (65%) held their preferred role in decision-making, with fathers more likely to hold their preferred role than mothers (p=0.02). A small number of parents (11%) experienced heightened decisional regret, which did not correlate with socio-demographic characteristics or preferred decision-making role. Qualitative results supported quantitative findings, demonstrating a decision-making process that emphasised trust and honesty. CONCLUSIONS: Guatemalan parents preferred to make decisions with their medical team and appreciated providers who were honest and inclusive, but directive about decisions. This study reinforces the importance of the provider-parent relationship and encourages clinicians in all settings to ask about and honour each parent's desired role in decision-making.
21
Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury, Jonathan C. Craig · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · 2007 · 41.6K citations · Full text
The qualitative content analysis process
Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs · Journal of Advanced Nursing · 2008 · 22.3K citations · Full text
Nursing, Advanced Practice Nursing, Evidence-based Practice +8
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
Benjamin Saunders, Julius Sim, Tom Kingstone et al. · Quality & Quantity · 2017 · 11.6K citations · Full text
Validation of a Decision Regret Scale
Annette M. O’Connor, Timothy J. Wood, Thomas F. Hack et al. · Medical Decision Making · 2003 · 1.4K citations