Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2022 · 23 citations · 14 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineOncologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyHybrid ImagingCancer DiagnosisPositron Emission TomographyProstate BiopsyProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingGleason ScoringPositive Predictive ValueProstate Cancer DiagnosisProstate-specific Membrane Antigen PetProstate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission TomographyProstate-specific Membrane Antigen RadioligandsPsma-pet ImagingReceiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Background: Hybrid imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is gaining importance as an increasingly meaningful tool for prostate cancer (PC) diagnostics and as a guide for therapy decisions. This study aims to investigate and compare the performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 (18F-PSMA) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA) in the initial staging of PC patients. Methods: The data of 88 biopsy-proven patients were retrospectively evaluated. PSMA-avid lesions were compared with the histopathologic Gleason Score (GS) for prostate biopsies, and the results were plotted by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve. Optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) cut-off values were rated using the Youden index. Results: 18F-PSMA was able to distinguish GS ≤ 7a from ≥7b with a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 92%, and accuracy of 67% for a SUVmax of 8.95, whereas sensitivity was 54%, specificity 91%, PPV 93%, and accuracy 66% for 68Ga-PSMA (SUVmax 8.7). Conclusions: Both methods demonstrated a high concordance of detected PSMA-avid lesions with histopathologically proven PC. 18F-PSMA and 68Ga-PSMA are both suitable for the characterization of primary PC with a comparable correlation of PSMA-avid lesions with GS. Neither method showed a superior advantage. Our calculated SUVmax thresholds may represent valuable parameters in clinical use to distinguish clinically significant PC (csPC) from non-csPC.
14
Michael S. Hofman, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Roslyn J. Francis et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 2K citations
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Louise Emmett, James P Buteau, Nathan Papa et al. · European Urology · 2021 · 418 citations
Isabel Rauscher, Michael König, Andrei Gafita et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2019 · 238 citations · Full text
Jonathan Kuten, Ibrahim Fahoum, Ziv Savin et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2019 · 220 citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Frederik L. Giesel, Leon Will, Ismaheel O. Lawal et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2017 · 176 citations · Full text