BMJ Open · 2022 · 16 citations · 39 references
NursingChild HealthFamily Health NursingChild Health NursingHealth Services ResearchIntegrated CareFamily-centered CareImmigrant Maternal HealthMigrant HealthPrenatal CareRefugee HealthRefugee Maternal HealthChild Health QualityDevelopmental Referral PathwaysImmigrant Maternal Health AccessImmigrant Women’s Healthcare UtilizationMigrant Child HealthPrimary Health Care AccessReferral PathwaysRefugee Women's Health
INTRODUCTION: Continuity of child and family healthcare is vital for optimal child health and development for developmentally vulnerable children. Migrant and refugee communities are often at-risk of poor health outcomes, facing barriers to health service attendance including cultural, language, limited health literacy, discrimination and unmet psychosocial needs. 'Integrated health-social care hubs' are physical hubs where health and social services are co-located, with shared referral pathways and care navigation. AIM: Our study will evaluate the impact, implementation and cost-benefit of the First 2000 Days Care Connect (FDCC) integrated hub model for pregnant migrant and refugee women and their infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study has three components. Component 1 is a non-randomised controlled trial to compare the FDCC model of care with usual care. This trial will allocate eligible women to intervention and control groups based on their proximity to the Hub sites. Outcome measures include: the proportion of children attending child and family health (CFH) nurse services and completing their CFH checks to 12 months of age; improved surveillance of growth and development in children up to 12 months, post partum; improved breastfeeding rates; reduced emergency department presentations; and improved maternal well-being. These will be measured using linked medical record data and surveys. Component 2 will involve a mixed-method implementation evaluation to clarify how and why FDCC was implemented within the sites to inform future roll-out. Component 3 is a within-trial economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Hubs relative to usual care and the implementation costs if Hubs were scaled and replicated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee in July 2021 (Project ID: 020/ETH03295). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001088831.
39
Laura J. Damschroder, David C. Aron, Rosalind E. Keith et al. · Implementation Science · 2009 · 14.8K citations · Full text
Public Health, Health Services Administration, Health Services Research +15
Detection of Postnatal Depression
J. L. Cox, Joan Holden, R. Sagovsky · The British Journal of Psychiatry · 1987 · 13.9K citations
Nursing, Maternal Health, Psychiatry +17
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
A.-W. Chan, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Peter C Gøtzsche et al. · BMJ · 2013 · 7.1K citations · Full text
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures
Bryan J. Weiner, Cara C. Lewis, Cameo Stanick et al. · Implementation Science · 2017 · 2.9K citations · Full text
Education, Counseling, Psychology +17