ACM Transactions on Graphics · 2002 · 164 citations · 39 references
ComputingComputational EngineeringComputer Science3D ModelingFinite Element AnalysisFinite Element MethodsAdaptive Mesh RefinementFinite Element DiscretizationFinite Element FormulationAdaptive RefinementBasis FunctionsConforming Finite ElementsHierarchical Basis FunctionsHigher-order Basis FunctionsLoop SubdivisionRefinementThin Shell Analysis
Finite element solvers are a basic component of simulation applications; they are common in computer graphics, engineering, and medical simulations. Although adaptive solvers can be of great value in reducing the often high computational cost of simulations they are not employed broadly. Indeed, building adaptive solvers can be a daunting task especially for 3D finite elements. In this paper we are introducing a new approach to produce conforming, hierarchical, adaptive refinement methods (CHARMS). The basic principle of our approach is to refine basis functions, not elements. This removes a number of implementation headaches associated with other approaches and is a general technique independent of domain dimension (here 2D and 3D), element type (e.g., triangle, quad, tetrahedron, hexahedron), and basis function order (piece-wise linear, higher order B-splines, Loop subdivision, etc.). The (un-)refinement algorithms are simple and require little in terms of data structure support. We demonstrate the versatility of our new approach through 2D and 3D examples, including medical applications and thin-shell animations.
39
An Analysis of the Finite Element Method
E. I., Gilbert Strang, George J. Fix · Mathematics of Computation · 1974 · 3.5K citations
Computing, Computational Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +12
Hugues Hoppe · 1996 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Demetri Terzopoulos, John Platt, Alan H. Barr et al. · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · 1987 · 1.1K citations · Full text