Publication | Open Access
Experimental optical and structural properties of ZnS, MgF2, Ta2O5, Al2O3 and TiO2 deposited by electron beam evaporation for optimum anti-reflective coating designs
19
Citations
23
References
2022
Year
Optical MaterialsEngineeringOptical CoatingsThin Film Process TechnologyTio2 SamplesElectron Beam EvaporationLayer ThicknessOptical PropertiesThin Film ProcessingProtective CoatingMaterials ScienceStructural PropertiesOxide ElectronicsOptoelectronic MaterialsLight MetalOptical CeramicAnti-reflective CoatingsMulti-functional CoatingDepth-graded Multilayer CoatingMaterials CharacterizationApplied PhysicsThin FilmsChemical Vapor DepositionSolar Cell Materials
MgF2, ZnS, Ta2O5, Al2O3 and TiO2 are some of the most common dielectric materials actually used in solar cells as anti-reflective coatings. For such purpose, they have been deposited by electron beam evaporation, which is one of the preferred technique in industrial settings. In this work we aim to understand the relationship between their optical and physical properties and deposition parameters and thicknesses, being spectroscopic ellipsometry the main technique used for such issue. MgF2 and ZnS have demonstrated rather good optical quality except for the thinnest samples. For Ta2O5, O2 flow during growth has been revealed as critical parameter for ensuring the proper composition of the layer. Al2O3 samples showed a very important amount of Al hydroxide, which is detrimental of the optical quality of these layers. TiO2 samples have also contamination problems, in this case due to oxygen species and Ti3+ oxide presence. For all these oxides, optical properties are clearly influenced by layer thickness. The layer optical parameters n and k have been determined as a function of wavelength (300–1800 nm) and validated against experimental reflectance and transmittance data. Finally, the impact that the proper knowledge of n and k values have when designing broad-band anti-reflective coatings for III-V multijunction solar cells is quantified in terms of short-circuit current relative increase.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1