Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · 2022 · 167 citations · 33 references
ComputingComputer ScienceCausal InferenceKnowledge RepresentationMachine LearningAttention NetworksCausal Graphical ModelsDeep LearningDirected Acyclic GraphsGraph-based LearningRepresentation LearningAttentionCausal Machine LearningCausal RelationshipsDirected Acyclic Graph LearningGraph ClassificationGraph Neural NetworksGraph Structure LearningSpurious Correlation
In graph classification, attention- and pooling-based graph neural networks (GNNs) prevail to extract the critical features from the input graph and support the prediction. They mostly follow the paradigm of learning to attend, which maximizes the mutual information between the attended graph and the ground-truth label. However, this paradigm makes GNN classifiers recklessly absorb all the statistical correlations between input features and labels in the training data, without distinguishing the causal and noncausal effects of features. Instead of underscoring the causal features, the attended graphs are prone to visit the noncausal features as the shortcut to predictions. Such shortcut features might easily change outside the training distribution, thereby making the GNN classifiers suffer from poor generalization.
33
DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2023 · 76.3K citations · Full text
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2020 · 21.6K citations · Full text