Publication | Open Access
Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
130
Citations
61
References
2022
Year
Solar radiation modification requires climate response projections, yet existing SRM simulations typically rely on a single, often unrealistic scenario, limiting policy relevance. The authors aim to fill this gap by outlining general scenario‑design principles for SRM and presenting a specific set of scenarios that capture a range of policy choices and uncertainties. They employ global climate models to run a suite of stratospheric aerosol injection simulations that span different deployment dates, temperature targets, and risk scenarios, offering a broad, community‑usable set of policy‑relevant scenarios. The study demonstrates that the current single‑scenario approach hampers risk comparison across SRM and non‑SRM options, highlighting the need for diverse scenario modeling.
Making informed future decisions about solar radiation modification (SRM; also known as solar geoengineering)—approaches such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) that would cool the climate by reflecting sunlight—requires projections of the climate response and associated human and ecosystem impacts. These projections, in turn, will rely on simulations with global climate models. As with climate-change projections, these simulations need to adequately span a range of possible futures, describing different choices, such as start date and temperature target, as well as risks, such as termination or interruptions. SRM modeling simulations to date typically consider only a single scenario, often with some unrealistic or arbitrarily chosen elements (such as starting deployment in 2020), and have often been chosen based on scientific rather than policy-relevant considerations (e.g., choosing quite substantial cooling specifically to achieve a bigger response). This limits the ability to compare risks both between SRM and non-SRM scenarios and between different SRM scenarios. To address this gap, we begin by outlining some general considerations on scenario design for SRM. We then describe a specific set of scenarios to capture a range of possible policy choices and uncertainties and present corresponding SAI simulations intended for broad community use.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1