Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · 2022 · 19 citations · 31 references
MedicineOrthopedic SurgerySurgeryMedical RoboticsOrthopedicsSpine SurgeryMinimally Invasive Spine SurgeryRobot-assisted SurgeryPercutaneous Pedicle Screw FixationRobotic-assisted Spine SurgeryThoracolumbar FracturesUnivariate Risk Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and risk factors of pedicle screw placement accuracy and the proximal facet joint violation (FJV) using TINAVI robot-assisted technique. METHODS: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures or degenerative diseases were retrospectively recruited from June 2018 and June 2020. The pedicle penetration and proximal FJV were compared in different instrumental levels to identify the safe and risk segments during insertion. Moreover, the factors were also assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with 332 pedicle screws were included in the current study. The optimal and clinically acceptable screw positions were 85.8% and 93.4%. Of the 332 screws concerning the intra-pedicular accuracy, 285 screws (85.8%) were evaluated as Grade A according to the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, with the remaining 25 (7.6%), 10 (3.0%), 6 (1.8%), and 6 screws (1.8%) as Grades B, C, D, and E. Moreover, in terms of the proximal FJV, 255 screws (76.8%) screws were assessed as Grade 0 according to the Babu scale, with the remaining 34 (10.3%), 22 (6.6%), and 21 screws (6.3%) as Grades 1, 2, and 3. Furthermore, the univariate analysis showed significantly higher rate of penetration for patients with age < 61 years old, sex of female, thoracolumbar insertion, shorter distance from skin to insertion point, and smaller facet angle. Meanwhile, the patients with the sex of female, BMI < 25.9, grade I spondylolisthesis, lumbosacral insertion, longer distance from skin to insertion point, and larger facet angle had a significantly higher rate of proximal FJV. The outcomes of multivariate analyses showed that sex of male (adjusted OR 0.320, 95% CI 0.140-0.732; p = 0.007), facet angle ≥ 45° (adjusted OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.090-0.786; p = 0.017), distance from skin to insertion point ≥ 4.5 cm (adjusted OR 0.342, 95% CI 0.134-0.868; p = 0.024), and lumbosacral instrumentation (adjusted OR 0.227, 95% CI 0.091-0.566; p = 0.001) were independently associated with intra-pedicular accuracy; the L5 insertion (adjusted OR 2.020, 95% CI 1.084-3.766; p = 0.027) and facet angle ≥ 45° (adjusted OR 1.839, 95% CI 1.026-3.298; p = 0.041) were independently associated with the proximal FJV. CONCLUSION: TINAVI robot-assisted technique was associated with a high rate of pedicle screw placement and a low rate of proximal FJV. This new technique showed a safe and precise performance for pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery. Facet angle ≥ 45° is independently associated with both the intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV.
31
Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo
Stanley D. Gertzbein, STEPHEN E. ROBBINS · Spine · 1990 · 1.4K citations
Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Placement of Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws
Florian Ringel, Carsten Stüer, Andreas Reinke et al. · Spine · 2012 · 351 citations
Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions
Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim, Tae-Ahn Jahng et al. · Spine · 2016 · 305 citations
Ho‐Joong Kim, Whan‐Ik Jung, Bong‐Soon Chang et al. · International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · 2016 · 247 citations