American Journal of Infection Control · 2022 · 14 citations · 19 references
MedicineSurgeryHemodynamic ManagementPerioperative Infection PreventionVascular SurgeryCatheter CareCatheter ManagementCentral Venous Access CareIntravenous Access DevicesIntravenous Drug DeliveryVascular Access SafetyCatheter DislodgementNosocomial Bloodstream InfectionsPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter ManagementPrimary Outcome Analysis
•Midlines can achieve high rates of therapy completion.•Midlines have low rates of major complications.•Minor complications are common with midlines.•Midline dislodgement frequently occurs. BackgroundMidline catheters are recommended over peripherally inserted central catheters as short-term vascular access device for peripherally compatible infusates. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of midline catheters.MethodsData from midline catheter placements from June 2016 to May 2019 at a tertiary-care Veterans Administration medical center were retrospectively collected. Patients were followed until catheter removal or death, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was completion of intended therapy; secondary outcomes were catheter-related complications, including major (eg, catheter-related bloodstream infections [CRBSI] or venous thromboembolism [VTE]) and minor (eg, catheter occlusion, kinking, dislodgement) events.ResultsOf 115 midlines, 62 (53.9%) were for antibiotic infusion and 49 (32.6%) for difficult access. The median dwell time was 11 days (interquartile range, 5.5-19.5 days). Midline catheters lasted through completion of therapy in 93 patients (80.9%). Catheter-related complications occurred in 27 patients (23.5%), including catheter dislodgement in 10 patients (8.7%), catheter kinking in 8 (7.0%), and catheter occlusion in 3 (2.6%). Only 1 patient experienced a major complication, a deep venous thrombosis (0.9%).ConclusionsMidlines appear to be effective and safe for short-term vascular access in patients requiring peripherally compatible infusates. While the rate of major complications is low, minor complications that necessitate device removal are common. Midline catheters are recommended over peripherally inserted central catheters as short-term vascular access device for peripherally compatible infusates. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of midline catheters. Data from midline catheter placements from June 2016 to May 2019 at a tertiary-care Veterans Administration medical center were retrospectively collected. Patients were followed until catheter removal or death, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was completion of intended therapy; secondary outcomes were catheter-related complications, including major (eg, catheter-related bloodstream infections [CRBSI] or venous thromboembolism [VTE]) and minor (eg, catheter occlusion, kinking, dislodgement) events. Of 115 midlines, 62 (53.9%) were for antibiotic infusion and 49 (32.6%) for difficult access. The median dwell time was 11 days (interquartile range, 5.5-19.5 days). Midline catheters lasted through completion of therapy in 93 patients (80.9%). Catheter-related complications occurred in 27 patients (23.5%), including catheter dislodgement in 10 patients (8.7%), catheter kinking in 8 (7.0%), and catheter occlusion in 3 (2.6%). Only 1 patient experienced a major complication, a deep venous thrombosis (0.9%). Midlines appear to be effective and safe for short-term vascular access in patients requiring peripherally compatible infusates. While the rate of major complications is low, minor complications that necessitate device removal are common.
19
Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition
Lisa A. Gorski, Lynn Hadaway, Mary Hagle et al. · Journal of Infusion Nursing · 2020 · 1K citations · Full text
Vineet Chopra, Scott A. Flanders, Sanjay Saint et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 592 citations
Nursing, Health Services Administration, Drug Utilization Review +16
The 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice
Home Healthcare Now · 2017 · 364 citations
Jean‐François Timsit, Olivier Mimoz, Bruno Mourvillier et al. · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2012 · 280 citations
Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Stewardship +16