EJNMMI Physics · 2022 · 32 citations · 35 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyRadiation DosimetryComputed TomographyComputed Tomography PhysicsIn Vivo DosimetryNuclear Medicine ImagingPhantom DosimetryComputed Tomography Phantom DosimetryData Acquisition ParametersImage Acquisition ParametersIterative Image ReconstructionIterative ReconstructionQuantitative Single-photon Emission Computed TomographyRadioactive Half-lifeRadionuclide Quantification
Abstract Background Lead-212 ( 212 Pb) is a promising radionuclide for targeted therapy, as it decays to α-particle emitter bismuth-212 ( 212 Bi) via β-particle emission. This extends the problematic short half-life of 212 Bi. In preparation for upcoming clinical trials with 212 Pb, the feasibility of quantitative single photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging of 212 Pb was studied, with the purpose to explore the possibility of individualised patient dosimetric estimation. Results Both acquisition parameters (combining two different energy windows and two different collimators) and iterative reconstruction parameters (varying the iterations x subsets between 10 × 1, 15 × 1, 30 × 1, 30 × 2, 30 × 3, 30 × 4, and 30 × 30) were investigated to evaluate visual quality and quantitative uncertainties based on phantom images. Calibration factors were determined using a homogeneous phantom and were stable when the total activity imaged exceeded 1 MBq for all the imaging protocols studied, but they increased sharply as the activity decayed below 1 MBq. Both a 20% window centred on 239 keV and a 40% window on 79 keV, with dual scatter windows of 5% and 20%, respectively, could be used. Visual quality at the lowest activity concentrations was improved with the High Energy collimator and the 79 keV energy window. Fractional uncertainty in the activity quantitation, including uncertainties from calibration factors and small volume effects, in spheres of 2.6 ml in the NEMA phantom was 16–21% for all protocols with the 30 × 4 filtered reconstruction except the High Energy collimator with the 239 keV energy window. Quantitative analysis was possible both with and without filters, but the visual quality of the images improved with a filter. Conclusions Only minor differences were observed between the imaging protocols which were all determined suitable for quantitative imaging of 212 Pb. As uncertainties generally decreased with increasing iterative updates in the reconstruction and recovery curves did not converge with few iterations, a high number of reconstruction updates are recommended for quantitative imaging.
35
3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network
Andriy Fedorov, Reinhard Beichel, Jayashree Kalpathy–Cramer et al. · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2012 · 8.9K citations · Full text
Arts, Computer Science, Radiology +12
Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Frank Bruchertseifer et al. · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2014 · 397 citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +16
The epidemiology of metastases in neuroendocrine tumors
Matias Riihimäki, Akseli Hemminki, Kristina Sundquist et al. · International Journal of Cancer · 2016 · 376 citations · Full text