2018 · 117 citations · 25 references
ComputingComputer ScienceAuditingFeature EngineeringMachine LearningFraud DetectionFraud Risk AnalyticsRisk ClassificationRisk ScoringBlack Box ModelingBlack-box TestingMachine Learning Credit ScoringPredictive Scoring ModelsRisk Prediction ScoresStudent Risk Classification
Black-box risk scoring models permeate our lives, yet are typically proprietary or opaque. We propose Distill-and-Compare, an approach to audit such models without probing the black-box model API or pre-defining features to audit. To gain insight into black-box models, we treat them as teachers, training transparent student models to mimic the risk scores assigned by the black-box models. We compare the mimic model trained with distillation to a second, un-distilled transparent model trained on ground truth outcomes, and use differences between the two models to gain insight into the black-box model. We demonstrate the approach on four data sets: COMPAS, Stop-and-Frisk, Chicago Police, and Lending Club. We also propose a statistical test to determine if a data set is missing key features used to train the black-box model. Our test finds that the ProPublica data is likely missing key feature(s) used in COMPAS.
25
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Geoffrey E. Hinton, Oriol Vinyals · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2015 · 14K citations · Full text
Robert A. Koyak, T. J. Hastie, Ryan J. Tibshirani · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1991 · 7.7K citations
Cristian Buciluǎ, Rich Caruana, Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil · 2006 · 2.1K citations
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A. Friedler, John Moeller et al. · 2015 · 1.8K citations