Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · 2018 · 176 citations · 80 references
EngineeringData TrustVerificationData Science SystemsData ScienceManagementData IntegrationData GovernanceData ManagementData PrivacyTrustComputer ScienceInformation ManagementTrusted SystemResponsible Data ManagementData Science ResearchData PracticeTrust ManagementData Science WorkKnowledge ManagementData Literacy
Trustworthiness of data science systems in real‑world settings arises from resolving tensions through situated, pragmatic, ongoing work. Drawing on CSCW, critical data studies, and the history and sociology of science, and six months of immersive ethnographic fieldwork with a corporate data science team, the authors identify four common tensions—(un)equivocal numbers, (counter)intuitive knowledge, (in)credible data, and (in)scrutable models. They find that organizational actors build and renegotiate trust amid messy, uncertain analytics by practicing skepticism, assessment, and credibility, and that trust management depends on pre‑processing, quantification, negotiation, and translation, with implications for data science research and practice.
The trustworthiness of data science systems in applied and real-world settings emerges from the resolution of specific tensions through situated, pragmatic, and ongoing forms of work. Drawing on research in CSCW, critical data studies, and history and sociology of science, and six months of immersive ethnographic fieldwork with a corporate data science team, we describe four common tensions in applied data science work: (un)equivocal numbers, (counter)intuitive knowledge, (in)credible data, and (in)scrutable models. We show how organizational actors establish and re-negotiate trust under messy and uncertain analytic conditions through practices of skepticism, assessment, and credibility. Highlighting the collaborative and heterogeneous nature of real-world data science, we show how the management of trust in applied corporate data science settings depends not only on pre-processing and quantification, but also on negotiation and translation. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for data science research and practice, both within and beyond CSCW.
80
Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, Carlos Guestrin · 2016 · 14K citations
Anthony F. C. Wallace, Harold Garfinkel · American Sociological Review · 1968 · 12.6K citations
Methodological Orientation, Social Research, Ethnohistory +20
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
John P. A. Ioannidis · PLoS Medicine · 2005 · 10.2K citations · Full text
“Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Marco Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, Carlos Guestrin · 2016 · 4.8K citations · Full text