IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2022 · 92 citations · 47 references
ComputingEarth SciencesComputer VisionRemote SensingSpectroscopic AnalysisHyperspectral ImagingImage ClassificationRemote Sensing Image AnalysisRemote Sensing ImageryAttentionAttention MechanismsHyperspectral AnalysisHyperspectral ClassificationHyperspectral Feature ExtractionHyperspectral Image ClassificationHyperspectral Image ProcessingSpectral Features
The development of remote sensing images in recent years has made it possible to identify materials in inaccessible environments and study natural materials on a large scale. But hyperspectral images (HSIs) are a rich source of information with their unique features in various applications. However, several problems reduce the accuracy of HSI classification; for example, the extracted features are not effective, noise, the correlation of bands, and most importantly, the limited labeled samples. To improve accuracy in the case of limited training samples, we propose a multiscale dual-branch residual spectral–spatial network with attention to the HSI classification model named MDBRSSN in this article. First, due to the correlation and redundancy between HSI bands, a principal component analysis operation is applied to preprocess the raw HSI data. Then, in MDBRSSN, a dual-branch structure is designed to extract the useful spectral–spatial features of HSI. The advanced feature, multiscale abstract information extracted by the convolution neural network, is applied to image processing, which can improve complex hyperspectral data classification accuracy. In addition, the attention mechanisms applied separately to each branch enable MDBRSSN to optimize and refine the extracted feature maps. Such an MDBRSSN framework can learn and fuse deeper hierarchical spectral–spatial features with fewer training samples. The purpose of designing the MDBRSSN model is to have high classification accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods when the training samples are limited, which is proved by the results of the experiments in this article on four datasets. In Salinas, Pavia University, Indian Pines, and Houston 2013, the proposed model obtained 99.64%, 98.93%, 98.17%, and 96.57% overall accuracy using only 1%, 1%, 5%, and 5% of labeled data for training, respectively, which are much better compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
47
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens van der Maaten et al. · 2017 · 44.7K citations
Xiaolong Wang, Ross Girshick, Abhinav Gupta et al. · 2018 · 11.2K citations
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Wei Hu, Yangyu Huang, Li Wei et al. · Journal of Sensors · 2015 · 1.9K citations · Full text