Remote Sensing · 2022 · 11 citations · 34 references
ComputingGeoinformaticsGeological EngineeringDigital Elevation ModelingSubdivision PlanningTerrain AnalysisSlope AnalysisTerrain ClassificationTerrain Feature ExtractionTerrain MorphometryTopographic AnalysisTopographic InterpretationDigital Elevation Model ProcessingGeomorphological AnalysisMulti-scale OptimizationMulti-scale Slope AnalysisSlope UnitsStepwise RefinementSubdivisionTopographic Feature Extraction
Slope units (SUs) are sub-watersheds bounded by ridge and valley lines. A slope unit reflects the physical relationship between landslides and geomorphological features and is especially useful for landslide sensitivity modeling. There have been significant algorithmic advances in the automatic delineation of SUs. But the intrinsic difficulties of determining input parameters and correcting for unreasonable SUs have hindered their wide application. An improved method of the evaluation and local multi-scale optimization for the automatic extraction of SUs is proposed. The Sus’ groups more consistent with the topographic features were achieved through a stepwise approach from a global optimum to a local refining. First, the preliminary subdivisions of multiple SUs were obtained based on the r.slopeunit software. The optimal subdivision scale was obtained by a collaborative evaluation approach capable of simultaneously measuring objective minimum discrepancies and seeking a global optimum. Second, under the selected optimal scale, unreasonable SUs such as over-subdivided slope units (OSSUs) and under-subdivided slope units (USSUs) were further distinguished. The local average similarity (LS) metric for each SU was designed based on calculating the SU’s area, common boundary and neighborhood variability. The inflection points of the cumulative frequency curve of LS were calculated as the distinguishing intervals for those unrealistic SUs by maximum interclass variance threshold. Third, a new effective optimization mechanism containing the re-subdivision of USSUs and merging of OSSUs was put into effect. We thus obtained SUs composed of terrain subdivisions with multiple scales, which is currently one of the few available methods for non-single scales. The statistical distributions of density, size and shapes demonstrate the excellent performance of the refined SUs in capturing the variability of complex terrains. Benefiting from the sufficient integrating approach of diverse features for each object, it is a significant advantage that the processing object can be transferred from general entirety to each precise individual.
34
Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models
Fausto Guzzetti, Paola Reichenbach, Francesca Ardizzone et al. · Geomorphology · 2006 · 944 citations
Geomorphometry and landform mapping: What is a landform?
Ian S. Evans · Geomorphology · 2011 · 351 citations
Massimiliano Alvioli, Ivan Marchesini, Paola Reichenbach et al. · Geoscientific model development · 2016 · 329 citations · Full text
Computing, Earth Sciences, Hydrology +17