IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2022 · 31 citations · 36 references
BusinessComputer ScienceMathematicsDecision AnalysisDecision TheoryMulti-criteria Decision MakingAggregation OperatorsData IntegrationFuzzy Multi-criteria Decision MakingIntegral EquationsMulti-criteria Decision AnalysisAggregationCriteria Aggregation FunctionsFuzzy Choquet IntegralFuzzy Rule-based SystemsMonotonicity ConstraintsMulticriteria Decision AnalysisPreference Aggregation FunctionsRule-based Classification
The Choquet integral (CI) is an averaging aggregation function that has been used, e.g., in the fuzzy reasoning method (FRM) of fuzzy rule-based classification systems (FRBCSs) and in multicriteria decision making in order to take into account the interactions among data/criteria. Several generalizations of the CI have been proposed in the literature in order to improve the performance of FRBCSs and also to provide more flexibility in the different models by relaxing both the monotonicity requirement and averaging conditions of aggregation functions. An important generalization is the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals, which are preaggregation functions that may present interesting nonaveraging behavior depending on the function <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$F$</tex-math></inline-formula> adopted in the construction and, in this case, offering competitive results in classification. Recently, the concept of d-Choquet integrals was introduced as a generalization of the CI by restricted dissimilarity functions (RDFs), improving the usability of CIs, as when comparing inputs by the usual difference may not be viable. The objective of this article is to introduce the concept of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$dC_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals, which is a generalization of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals by RDFs. The aim is to analyze whether the usage of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$dC_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals in the FRM of FRBCSs represents a good alternative toward the standard <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals that just consider the difference as a dissimilarity measure. For that, we consider six RDFs combined with five fuzzy measures, applied with more than 20 functions <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$F$</tex-math></inline-formula> . The analysis of the results is based on statistical tests, demonstrating their efficiency. Additionally, comparing the applicability of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$dC_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals versus <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{F}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -integrals, the range of the good generalizations of the former is much larger than that of the latter.
36
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
Sture Holm · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · 1979 · 21.8K citations
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets
Janez Demšar · 2006 · 11.2K citations
KEEL: a software tool to assess evolutionary algorithms for data mining problems
Jesús Alcalá‐Fdez, Luciano Sánchez, Salvador García et al. · Soft Computing · 2008 · 1.5K citations · Full text