Journal of surgical education · 2022 · 64 citations · 20 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryOrthopedicsPediatric OrthopaedicsPediatric Orthopedic SurgeryOrthopedic Surgical InstrumentsVirtual RealityVirtual Reality In MedicinePin PlacementResident Surgical EducationSurgical SimulationSurgical Simulation TrainingSurgical Skill TrainingSurgical TrainingVirtual Reality FeedbackVirtual Reality Surgical Simulation
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. All participants were provided a technique video and SG; the VR group additionally trained via an Osso VR surgical trainer (ossovr.com) with real-time feedback and coaching from an attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Following training, participants performed a SCFE guidewire placement on a SawBones model embedded in a soft-tissue envelope (SawBones model 1161). Participants were asked to achieve "ideal placement" based on the training provided. Participants were evaluated on time, number of pin "in-and outs," penetration of the articular surface, angle between the pin and the physis, distance from pin tip to subchondral bone and distance from the center-center point of the epiphysis. SETTING: Orthopedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, CA. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty fourth-year medical students, first- and second-year orthopedic residents without experience with the SCFE procedure. RESULTS: Twenty participants were randomized to SG (n = 10) or VR (n = 10). Average time to final pin placement was 19% shorter in VR group (706 vs 573 seconds, p = 0.26). When compared to SG, the VR group had, on average, 70% less pin in-and-outs (1.7 vs 0.5, p = 0.28), 50% less articular surface penetrations (0.4 vs 0.2, p = 0.36), and 18% smaller distance from pin tip to subchondral bone on lateral view (7.1 vs 5.8 mm, p = 0.42). Moreover, the VR group had a lower average angle deviation between pin and line perpendicular to the physis on coronal view (4.9° vs 2.5°, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VR training is potentially more effective than traditional preparatory methods. This pilot study suggests that VR training may be a viable surgical training tool, which may alleviate constraints of time, money, and safety concerns with resultant broad applicability for surgical education.
20
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
Neal E. Seymour, Anthony G. Gallagher, Sanziana A. Roman et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2002 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Medical Education, Surgery +17
Operative Experience of Residents in US General Surgery Programs
Richard H. Bell, Thomas W. Biester, Arnold Tabuenca et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2009 · 415 citations
Medicine, Medical Education, Surgery +15