How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales - Concepedia

Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales

16

Citations

11

References

2022

Year

Kim Cocks, Jacqueline Buchanan

Quality of Life Research

ReliabilityBehavioral SciencesEngineeringUsability EngineeringMinimal Important DifferencesUser ExperienceItem Response TheoryEortc Qlq-c30 SubscalesHuman-computer InteractionUser EvaluationElectronic AssessmentCommunicationAutomated AssessmentUser-centric EvaluationResponder Definition

References

	Year	Citations

Page 1