The Journal of Risk Finance · 2022 · 134 citations · 53 references
BusinessFinanceArmed ConflictCorporate FinanceInternational EconomicsEvent Study AnalysisFinancial CrisesFinancial RiskMarket RiskPolitical RiskCountry Risk ExposureCountry-specific RiskCross-sectional Financial AnalysisCumulative Abnormal ReturnsGeopolitical PowerGeopolitical RiskMarket-to-book RatioStock Market Returns
Let's collect. Background: lines with [Background] only: "Previous studies on the Russia–Ukraine war have been limited to analyzing the behavior of leading stock market indices without examining firm-level variations triggered by the war." Also [Purpose, Mechanism] line includes background? It says "This study fills this gap and contributes to the growing literature on the Russia–Ukraine crisis in two ways: first, it provides firm-level evidence from the G7 countries in addition to how global stock market indices have reacted to the invasion and second, it uses cross-sectional analysis to provide evidence of the characteristics that make firms resilient to wars." That is more purpose and mechanism but also background? It's labeled Purpose, Mechanism. So for Background we only have the first sentence.
Purpose This study examines the impact of the Russia–Ukraine war on the constituent firms of the leading stock market indices of the G7 countries to provide insights into the vulnerability of firms to war events. Design/methodology/approach This study employs the event study method on a sample of 531 firms covering the period from 02 March 2021 to 08 March 2022 and conducts a cross-sectional analysis of cumulative abnormal returns and country- and firm-specific variables. Findings Risk exposure and trade dependence trigger invasion-generated negative abnormal returns. The authors demonstrate that stock prices are fragile to geopolitical risks and trade dependence. Consistent with previous literature, the authors find evidence of a size anomaly and high risk associated with a higher book-to-market ratio. Research limitations/implications This study has implications for policymakers identifying the firm-specific variables driving event-induced returns. While providing insights into the geographical diversification of funds, this study shows the heterogeneous characteristics of firms operating in these countries. Originality/value Previous studies on the Russia–Ukraine war have been limited to analyzing the behavior of leading stock market indices without examining firm-level variations triggered by the war. This study fills this gap and contributes to the growing literature on the Russia–Ukraine crisis in two ways: first, it provides firm-level evidence from the G7 countries in addition to how global stock market indices have reacted to the invasion and second, it uses cross-sectional analysis to provide evidence of the characteristics that make firms resilient to wars. Highlights We are the first to report firm-level evidence of the Russia–Ukraine war effects Firms in France and the United States are unaffected Stock prices are fragile to geopolitical risks and considerable dependence on trade Higher book-to-market exposes the firms to the risk of exogenous shocks Smaller firms outperform large firms in the G7 stock markets
53
Stephen J. Brown, Jerold B. Warner · Journal of Financial Economics · 1985 · 6.6K citations
The relationship between return and market value of common stocks
Rolf W. Banz · Journal of Financial Economics · 1981 · 6.1K citations
The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information
Eugene F. Fama, Lawrence Fisher, Michael C. Jensen et al. · International Economic Review · 1969 · 3.6K citations
Dario Caldara, Matteo Iacoviello · American Economic Review · 2022 · 3.2K citations
Social Sciences, International Relations, Political Science +17
Size and Book‐to‐Market Factors in Earnings and Returns
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · The Journal of Finance · 1995 · 3.2K citations