PharmacoEconomics · 2022 · 37 citations · 32 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Nuclear MedicineDiagnostic RadiologyPelvic Oncology ImagingPositron Emission TomographyProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingUrologic Cancer DiagnosisCost-effectivenessPositron Emission Tomography DetectionProstate Cancer Detection Using Prostate-specific AntigenProstate Computed TomographyProstate-specific Membrane Antigen PetProstate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission TomographyPsma-pet ImagingSensitivity
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) is a new imaging modality to detect the extra-prostatic spread of prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT has a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging (CT ± whole body bone scan [WBBS]). This study conducted a cost-utility analysis of PSMA PET/CT compared with conventional imaging for patients with newly diagnosed, intermediate-risk or high-risk primary prostate cancer. PERSPECTIVE: Australian healthcare perspective. SETTING: Tertiary. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model combined data from a variety of sources. The time horizon was 35 years. The sensitivity and specificity of PSMA PET/CT and CT alone were based on meta-analyses and the test accuracy of CT+WBBS was based on a single randomised controlled trial. Health outcomes included cases detected, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years. Costs related to other diagnostic tests, initial treatment, adverse events, and post-disease progression were included. All costs were reported in 2021 Australian Dollars (A$). RESULTS: The deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of PSMA PET/CT was estimated to be A $21,147/quality-adjusted life-year gained versus CT+WBBS, and A$36,231/quality-adjusted life-year gained versus CT alone. The results were most sensitive to the time horizon, and the initial treatments received by patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer. The probability of PSMA PET/CT being cost effective was estimated to be 91% versus CT+WBBS and 89% versus CT alone, using a threshold of AU$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/CT is likely to be more costly than CT+WBBS or CT alone in Australia; however, it is still likely to be considered cost effective compared with conventional imaging.
32
Mack Roach, Gerald E. Hanks, Howard D. Thames et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2006 · 2.7K citations
Michael S. Hofman, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Roslyn J. Francis et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 2K citations
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Don Husereau, Michael Drummond, Stavros Petrou et al. · BMJ · 2013 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Duration of Androgen Suppression in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
M. Bolla, Theodorus M. de Reijke, Geertjan van Tienhoven et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 966 citations · Full text