Healthcare · 2022 · 363 citations · 37 references
MedicineDermatologyOncologyComputer VisionCutaneous OncologyDermatopathologyBasal Cell CarcinomaMelanocytic TumorsNonmelanocytic Skin TumorsSkin TumorsTumor ClassificationTumor DetectionBenign Melanocytic TumorsConvolutional Neural Network DetectionDeep Learning DetectionDeep Learning-based Lesion ClassificationLesion Detection In ImagesLesion Image ClassificationSkin Cancer DetectionSkin Lesion Detection
An increasing number of genetic and metabolic anomalies have been determined to lead to cancer, generally fatal. Cancerous cells may spread to any body part, where they can be life-threatening. Skin cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, and its frequency is increasing worldwide. The main subtypes of skin cancer are squamous and basal cell carcinomas, and melanoma, which is clinically aggressive and responsible for most deaths. Therefore, skin cancer screening is necessary. One of the best methods to accurately and swiftly identify skin cancer is using deep learning (DL). In this research, the deep learning method convolution neural network (CNN) was used to detect the two primary types of tumors, malignant and benign, using the ISIC2018 dataset. This dataset comprises 3533 skin lesions, including benign, malignant, nonmelanocytic, and melanocytic tumors. Using ESRGAN, the photos were first retouched and improved. The photos were augmented, normalized, and resized during the preprocessing step. Skin lesion photos could be classified using a CNN method based on an aggregate of results obtained after many repetitions. Then, multiple transfer learning models, such as Resnet50, InceptionV3, and Inception Resnet, were used for fine-tuning. In addition to experimenting with several models (the designed CNN, Resnet50, InceptionV3, and Inception Resnet), this study's innovation and contribution are the use of ESRGAN as a preprocessing step. Our designed model showed results comparable to the pretrained model. Simulations using the ISIC 2018 skin lesion dataset showed that the suggested strategy was successful. An 83.2% accuracy rate was achieved by the CNN, in comparison to the Resnet50 (83.7%), InceptionV3 (85.8%), and Inception Resnet (84%) models.
37
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
Christian Szegedy, Sergey Ioffe, Vincent Vanhoucke et al. · 2017 · 12.6K citations · Full text
Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár et al. · 2017 · 12.3K citations
Identifying pneumonia in chest X-rays: A deep learning approach
Amit Kumar Jaiswal, Prayag Tiwari, Sachin Kumar et al. · Measurement · 2019 · 509 citations
Deep learning for image-based cancer detection and diagnosis − A survey
Zilong Hu, Jinshan Tang, Ziming Wang et al. · Pattern Recognition · 2018 · 506 citations