Infection and Drug Resistance · 2022 · 13 citations · 29 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesEpidemiologyInfectious Disease EpidemiologyMedical MicrobiologyAntibiotic ResistanceBacterial InfectionsHealthcare-associated InfectionsInfectious Disease ScreeningNosocomial Infection EpidemiologySusceptibility To InfectionCommunity-acquired Infection EpidemiologyCommunity-acquired Infection SurveillanceCommunity-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus InfectionCross-sectional Incidence StudyCross-sectional Sampling DesignHealthcare Worker Infection SurveillanceHealthcare-associated Infection RiskStaphylococcus Aureus Colonization
Background: Staphylococcus aureus is a major human pathogen and causes healthcare and community-acquired infection. Data on the extent of MRSA colonization among health-care workers (HCWs) in sub-Saharan Africa are limited. Hence, we determined the burden of MRSA colonisation among HCWs and administrative staff in Tikur Anbessa Specialised Hospital (TASH), College of Health Sciences (CHS), Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, participants were screened for MRSA colonisation between June 2018 and August 2019 using nasal swabs. The swabs were analysed using standard laboratory methods including antibiotic resistance gene, mecA . Anonymised sociodemographic data were collected by pretested questionnaires to evaluate HCWs factors associated with MRSA carriage. Results: A total of 588 HCWs and 468 administrative staff were screened for MRSA. Women were over-represented. Overall, 49.1% (289/588) of HCWs were nurses and 25% (117/468) of the administrative staff were cleaners or laundry workers. Overall, 138 S. aureus isolates were retrieved from the nasal swabs of both groups (16.3%, 96/588 from HCWs). The burden of MRSA colonisation was 4.8% (28/580, 95% CI: 3.1– 6.5%) among HCWs compared to 0.2% (1/468, 95% CI: 0.18– 0.6%) of administrative staff (p value < 0.05). The majority of S. aureus and all MRSA isolates were resistant to penicillin. Isolates from HCWs were more resistant to tested antibiotics than administrative staff (P-value < 0.05). Conclusion: This is the first report in Ethiopia on MRSA colonization using mecA and revealed that; (i) overall carriage rates of MRSA in HCWs are comparable with observations reported in some other countries and (ii) HCWs exhibit a higher burden of MRSA carriage than administrative staff. Our data support strategic screening of MRSA and antimicrobial stewardship for better intervention measures. Keywords: MRSA, HCWs, administrative staff, mecA , TASH, Ethiopia
29
David P. Calfee, Cassandra D. Salgado, Aaron M. Milstone et al. · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · 2014 · 192 citations
Public Health, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +14
James Price, Kevin Cole, Andrew Bexley et al. · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2016 · 190 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +17
Karsten Becker, Isabelle Pagnier, Brigitte Schuhen et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2006 · 131 citations · Full text
Agumas Shibabaw, Tamrat Abebe, Adane Mihret · Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control · 2013 · 116 citations · Full text