Philosophy & Technology · 2022 · 32 citations · 60 references
HumanitiesHealth InformaticsArtificial IntelligenceMedical EthicsPhilosophy Of ScienceAutonomyEvidence-based MedicinePhilosophy Of Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence RiskExplainabilityExplainable Artificial IntelligenceRight To Explanation
Abstract In this article, I will argue in favor of both the ethical and epistemological utility of explanations in artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical technology. I will build on the notion of “explicability” due to Floridi, which considers both the intelligibility and accountability of AI systems to be important for truly delivering AI-powered services that strengthen autonomy, beneficence, and fairness. I maintain that explicable algorithms do, in fact, strengthen these ethical principles in medicine, e.g., in terms of direct patient–physician contact, as well as on a longer-term epistemological level by facilitating scientific progress that is informed through practice. With this article, I will therefore attempt to counter arguments against demands for explicable AI in medicine that are based on a notion of “whatever heals is right.” I will elucidate my elaboration on the positive aspects of explicable AI in medicine as well as by pointing out risks of non-explicable AI.
60
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
David L. Sackett, William Rosenberg, J. A. Muir Gray et al. · BMJ · 1996 · 15.7K citations · Full text
Gordon Guyatt · JAMA · 1992 · 4.2K citations