Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2022 · 384 citations · 15 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyChemotherapySurgical OncologyCancer ProgressionMinimal Residual DiseaseOvarian CancerOvarian Cancer PharmacotherapyTherapy Response AssessmentClinicaltrials.gov RegistrationHomologous Recombination DeficiencyMaintenance Therapy TrialsOvarian Cancer ChemotherapyOvarian Cancer Clinical TrialsOvarian Cancer TreatmentRucaparib TherapySurgical Cytoreduction
PURPOSE ATHENA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522246 ) was designed to evaluate rucaparib first-line maintenance treatment in a broad patient population, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. We report the results from the ATHENA–MONO comparison of rucaparib versus placebo. METHODS Patients with stage III-IV high-grade ovarian cancer undergoing surgical cytoreduction (R0/complete resection permitted) and responding to first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomly assigned 4:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice a day or placebo. Stratification factors were HRD test status, residual disease after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery. The primary end point of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was assessed in a step-down procedure, first in the HRD population (BRCA-mutant or BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity high tumor), and then in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS As of March 23, 2022 (data cutoff), 427 and 111 patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib or placebo, respectively (HRD population: 185 v 49). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 28.7 months (23.0 to not reached) with rucaparib versus 11.3 months (9.1 to 22.1) with placebo in the HRD population (log-rank P = .0004; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.72); 20.2 months (15.2 to 24.7) versus 9.2 months (8.3 to 12.2) in the intent-to-treat population (log-rank P < .0001; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68); and 12.1 months (11.1 to 17.7) versus 9.1 months (4.0 to 12.2) in the HRD-negative population (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.95). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (rucaparib, 28.7% v placebo, 0%) and neutropenia (14.6% v 0.9%). CONCLUSION Rucaparib monotherapy is effective as first-line maintenance, conferring significant benefit versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with and without HRD.
15
Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Antonio González-Martı́n, Bhavana Pothuri, Ignace Vergote et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2019 · 2.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Éric Pujade-Lauraine, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Frédèric Selle et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2017 · 1.9K citations
Pharmacy, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +14
Robert L. Coleman, Amit M. Oza, Domenica Lorusso et al. · The Lancet · 2017 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Oncology +12