Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · 2022 · 10 citations · 16 references
EducationEducational MeasurementPsychologyFunctional AssessmentIntellectual DisabilitiesPsychometricsAdaptive FunctioningDisability AssessmentDisability EvaluationFunctional ImpairmentFunctional StatusPsychological TestingComposite Score ConstructionCriterion ValidityDisability Severity AssessmentDisability Severity MeasurementFunctional Impairment SeverityFunctional ScreeningInter-rater ReliabilityInternal Consistency Reliability
BACKGROUND: The dynamic nature of intellectual disability necessitates repeated screening. METHOD: The functional screening tool (FST-ID) for individuals with intellectual disabilities was carefully constructed. RESULTS: The FST-ID General Adaptive Composite score (GAC) runs between 0 and 68 points. Criterion validity-high-positive correlations were found between FST-ID and ABAS-II (Gold standard), and between the severity of the intellectual disability and the FST-ID (r = 0.78, p < .001). The scale holds high-internal consistency and intra- and inter-rater reliability values. The cut-off point between mild and moderate disability is 50.4 (Sensitivity: 87%, Specificity 86%, p < .001) and 29.4 between moderate to severe-profound (Sensitivity: 96%, Specificity 94%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The FST-ID presents high-psychometric properties and requires less than 5 min to complete. Using this tool may support efficient screening practices and improved supports for adults with intellectual disability.
16
Meir Lotan, Shira Yalon‐Chamovitz, Patrice L. Weiss · Research in Developmental Disabilities · 2008 · 119 citations
Aging Adults With Intellectual Disabilities
Elizabeth A. Perkins, Julie A. Moran · JAMA · 2010 · 103 citations