Publication | Closed Access
Normalization methods for spatio‐temporal analysis of environmental performance: Revisiting the Min–Max method
106
Citations
15
References
2022
Year
Composite IndicesEnvironmental PerformanceEnvironmental MonitoringEngineeringEconomic AssessmentEnvironmental Impact AssessmentSustainable DevelopmentSustainability IndicatorEnvironmental DataEnvironmental PlanningChange AnalysisMonitoring SustainabilityIndicator DevelopmentEnvironmental SustainabilityNormalization MethodsCultural PlanningPublic HealthStatisticsEnvironmental IndicatorSpatial Statistical AnalysisGeographyNational EconomiesSustainability AssessmentQuantitative Spatial ModelSustainable EnergyCountry PerformanceSustainabilityMin–max MethodSpatio-temporal ModelSpatial Statistics
Abstract Over the last few years, composite indices for ranking or assessing country performance in a wide variety of complex phenomena, such as environmental sustainability, have gained a lot of popularity. However, not all indices allow for detailed spatio‐temporal analyses. For instance, if individual indicators to be aggregated are normalized by the Min–Max method, they are converted to a common scale with a range of [0, 1] and it can be difficult to appreciate any absolute change in country performance at the extremes of the range (i.e., when a country scores 0 to 1). In this article, an alternative method for normalizing data in a three‐way array of the type units × variables × times, is considered. It normalizes the range of individual indicators, similarly to the Min–Max method, but uses a common reference that allows to “center” them, without forcing them into a closed range. An application to renewable energy consumption data is also shown.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1