The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · 2003 · 24 citations · 0 references
EducationKinesiologyPhysical EducationExercise PhysiologyExercise TestingHuman PerformanceFitness AssessmentMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength TestingMuscular StrengthMuscular Strength TestingPhysical FitnessEmpirical Prediction EquationsLifting CapacityMaximal Strength DevelopmentMultiple RegressionMuscle Performance EvaluationMuscle Power TestingMuscular Strength AssessmentSubmaximal Effort Assessment
Eighteen elite male power lifters performed 1-repetition maximum (1RM) and submaximal strength tests (70, 80, and 90% 1RM) to develop prediction equations for the squat (SQ), bench press (BP), and deadlift (DL) exercises. For each equation, stepwise multiple-regression prediction procedure included the maximum number of repetitions (REPS) completed at a given %1RM weight (REPWT). For SQ and BP the 70% 1RM yielded the best 1RM prediction equations: (1RM SQ [kg]) = 159.9 + (0.103 X REPS X REPWT) + (-11.552 X REPS), with a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 5.06 kg; (1RM BP [kg]) = 90.66 + (0.085 X REPS X REPWT) + (-5.306 X REPS), with an SEE of 2.69 kg. For DL the 80% 1RM yielded the best prediction equation: (1RM DL [kg]) = 156.08 + (0.098 X REPS X REPWT) + (-12.106 X REPS), with an SEE of 4.97 kg. The athlete's years lifted (number of years of power lifting experience) was highly correlated with the 1RM strength for BP and DL (r > 0.70) but not for SQ (r < 0.70). No bodily structural dimension variable had a significant correlation with 1RM strength (r < 0.70). The results of this study indicate that 1RM SQ, BP, and DL may be predicted with an acceptable degree of accuracy in elite male high-school power lifter subjects.