EJNMMI Physics · 2016 · 15 citations · 8 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCalibrationDiagnostic Imaging SystemsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingMedical Imaging InstrumentationPositron Emission TomographyCalibration Stability AssessmentCross-calibrationImaging System CalibrationLong-term StabilityPet QuantificationQuantitative Imaging CalibrationQuantitative Positron Emission TomographyWater Phantom Measurements
BACKGROUND: We present a quick and easy method to perform quantitatively accurate PET scans of typical water-filled PET plastic shell phantoms on the Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR system. We perform regular cross-calibrations (Xcal) of our PET systems, including the PET/MR, using a Siemens mCT water phantom. LONG-TERM STABILITY: The mMR calibration stability was evaluated over a 3-year period where 54 cross-calibrations were acquired, showing that the mMR on average underestimated the concentration by 16 %, consistently due to the use of MR-based μ-maps. The mMR produced the narrowest calibration ratio range with the lowest standard deviation, implying it is the most stable of the six systems in the study over a 3-year period. MMR ACCURACY WITH PREDEFINED μ-MAPS: With the latest mMR software version, VB20P, it is possible to utilize predefined phantom μ-maps. We evaluated both the system-integrated, predefined μ-map of the long mMR water phantom and our own user-defined CT-based μ-map of the mCT water phantom, which is used for cross-calibration. For seven scans, which were reconstructed with correctly segmented μ-maps, the mMR produced cross-calibration ratios of 1.00-1.02, well within the acceptance range [0.95-1.05], showing high accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The mMR is the most stable PET system in this study, and the mean underestimation is no longer an issue with the easily accessible μ-map, which resulted in correct cross-calibration ratios in all seven tests. We will share the user-defined μ-map of the mCT phantom and the protocol with interested mMR users.
8
Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner
Gaspar Delso, Sebastian Fürst, Björn Jakoby et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2011 · 876 citations · Full text
Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner
Bjoern Jakoby, Yanic Bercier, Maurizio Conti et al. · Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2011 · 483 citations
Method for transforming CT images for attenuation correction in PET/CT imaging
Jonathan Carney, David W. Townsend, V. Rappoport et al. · Medical Physics · 2006 · 266 citations
Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners.
Lilli Geworski, Bernd O. Knoop, Maike de Wit et al. · PubMed · 2002 · 86 citations