Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2013 · 10 citations · 12 references
MedicinePathologyCancer ScreeningCytopathologyDiagnostic ImagingCervicovaginal CytologyFine-needle Aspiration CytologyAspirate CytologyBiopsy Specimen AdequacyControl Group DesignCytological Specimen AdequacyFine-needle Aspiration Specimen AdequacyFna CytologyMatched Control GroupSpecimen Adequacy Criteria
Introduction The gold standard for assessing neck lumps is a one-stop clinic with an on-site cytopathologist who can provide an immediate fine needle aspiration (FNA) report. However, this has considerable resource implications and is not available in all units. In our department, surgeons perform FNAs guided by palpation. The FNA is evaluated for specimen adequacy by an on-site cytotechnician. This study evaluated the impact of the cytotechnician on the adequacy of neck lump FNA. Methods FNA performed between June 2010 and February 2012 was examined. The FNA performed at a neck lump clinic with an assessment of adequacy by an on-site cytotechnician were considered the test group. All other neck lump FNAs from other sources without an assessment of adequacy by an on-site cytotechnician were considered the control group. Results Of the FNAs, 134 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 87 FNAs (65%) were analysed for adequacy by the on-site cytotechnician and the remaining 47 (35%) were not. The results demonstrated an FNA inadequacy with and without on-site cytotechnician assessment of 29.9% and 40.4% respectively. This is equivalent to an absolute risk reduction of an inadequate FNA of 10.5%, which equates to a number needed to treat of 9.5, ie the cytotechnician needs to assess 9.5 (ie the cytotechnician […] specimen). Conclusions In neck lump clinics where on-site cytopathology is not available, an on-site cytotechnician is a compromise measure that does reduce the number of inadequate FNAs.
12
Use of Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Evaluation of Breast Lumps
Mulazim Hussain Bukhari, Madiha Arshad, Shahid Jamal et al. · Pathology Research International · 2011 · 81 citations · Full text