Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · 1994 · 179 citations · 0 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsNeuroscienceNeurolinguisticsPsycholinguisticsSyntaxParsingSentence ParsingSentence ProcessingSyntactic AnalysisSyntactic ParsingSyntactic ProcessingGarden Path EffectsP600 Effect In ParsingParsing AmbiguitySubcategorization BiasesSyntactic AmbiguitySyntactic ComprehensionSyntactic KnowledgeSyntactic Representation
Event-related potentials were recorded from 13 scalp locations while participants read sentences containing a syntactic ambiguity. In Experiment 1, syntactically disambiguating words that were inconsistent with the "favored" syntactic analysis elicited a positive-going brain potential (P600). Experiment 2 examined whether syntactic ambiguities are resolved by application of a phrase-structure-based minimal attachment principle or by word-specific subcategorization information. P600 amplitude was a function of subcategorization biases rather than syntactic complexity. These findings indicate that such biases exist and can influence the parser under certain conditions and that P600 amplitude is a function of the perceived syntactic well-formedness of the sentence.