Efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating molecular alterations (ImmunoTarget).

Julien Mazieres, Alexander Drilon, Laurent Mhanna, Julie Milia, Amellie Lusque, Alexis B. Cortot, Laura Mezquita, Alesha A. Thai, S. Couraud, Rémi Veillon,

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2018 · 54 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

9010 Background: Data on ICI activity in patients with oncogenic driver are limited. The aim of this study was to collect further data across various molecular subgroups. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of patients receiving ICI for stage IV NSCLC with genomic alterations. Anonymized data were evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes: best response (RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. Results: We included 527 patients treated in 25 centers The. Molecular alterations involved KRAS (n = 252), EGFR (n = 110), BRAF (n = 38), MET (n = 36), HER2 (n = 23), ALK (n = 18), RET (n = 14), ROS1 (n = 5), and multiple drivers (n = 31). Median age was 60 years, sex-ratio was 1:1, never/former/current smokers were 27/51/22%, and the majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma. ICIs were mainly anti-PD1 (92%) given in the first (5%), second (42%), third (26%), or later line (27%) settings. The best response rate was 19% [15-22%]. The median PFS and OS were 2.8 [2.5-3.1] and 13.3 [9.8-14.8] months, respectively. Outcomes by molecular subtypes are reported below (table 1). EGFR-mutant had shorter PFS compared to KRAS-mutant (p < 0.001). T790M mutation was associated with a shorter PFS than other EGFR mutations (p = 0.0001) whereas the benefit was the same across all KRAS mutation subtypes. Among MET alterations, exon 14 mutations were the most sensitive to ICI. PFS was positively influenced by smoking (p = 0.003) and PDL1 expression (p = 0.02) in the overall population but not for EGFR-mutant. Conclusions: ICI has inconstant efficacy in NSCLC harboring activating mutation. KRAS, BRAF and MET-exon 14 patients derive a greater benefit than EGFR, ALK and RET patients. Driver n Best response (%) PFS OS CR/PR SD PD Median (months*) 6 m PFS (%) 1 y PFS (%) Median (months*) BRAF 38 28.1 28.1 43.8 3.0 35 19 13.6 KRAS 252 27.2 23.1 49.8 3.2 39 26 13.5 ROS1 5 20 0 80 NA NA NA NA MET 36 15.6 34.4 50.0 3.4 33 23 18.4 EGFR 110 11.0 18.0 71.0 2.0 16 6 8.8 HER2 23 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 34 17 10.0 RET 14 7.1 21.4 71.4 2.2 16 8 6.5 ALK 18 0 21.4 78.6 2.1 16 8 17.0 *: from ICI initiation. CR/PR : Complete/Partial response, SD/PD Stable/Progressive disease.