Publication | Open Access
Architectural Support for Software-Defined Metadata Processing
21
Citations
52
References
2015
Year
EngineeringHardware TaggingComputer ArchitectureComposite PolicySoftware EngineeringMetadataArchitectural SupportSemantic WebProcessor ArchitectureSoftware AnalysisHardware ArchitectureHardware SecurityHigh-performance ArchitectureManagementLow Runtime OverheadData IntegrationParallel ComputingData ManagementMemory ManagementMetadata IntegrationMetadata ManagementComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceSoftware DesignMetadata InteroperabilityProgram AnalysisSystem Software
Optimized hardware can propagate and check software‑programmable metadata tags with low runtime overhead. The study generalizes hardware tagging to a generic architecture that supports software‑defined policies over arbitrary‑sized metadata, introducing optimizations that keep overhead low. The architecture employs microarchitectural optimizations and is applied to enforce four safety and security policies—spatial/temporal memory safety, taint tracking, control‑flow integrity, and code/data separation—along with a composite policy. The model matches hardware‑based efficiency while offering software flexibility, achieving modest runtime (≤10%) and power (≤10%) overhead, with increased energy (≤60%) and area (110%) on SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks.
Optimized hardware for propagating and checking software-programmable metadata tags can achieve low runtime overhead. We generalize prior work on hardware tagging by considering a generic architecture that supports software-defined policies over metadata of arbitrary size and complexity; we introduce several novel microarchitectural optimizations that keep the overhead of this rich processing low. Our model thus achieves the efficiency of previous hardware-based approaches with the flexibility of the software-based ones. We demonstrate this by using it to enforce four diverse safety and security policies---spatial and temporal memory safety, taint tracking, control-flow integrity, and code and data separation---plus a composite policy that enforces all of them simultaneously. Experiments on SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks with a PUMP-enhanced RISC processor show modest impact on runtime (typically under 10%) and power ceiling (less than 10%), in return for some increase in energy usage (typically under 60%) and area for on-chip memory structures (110%).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1