Publication | Closed Access
Which Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Can Be Detected by Oral Fluid Immunoassays?
11
Citations
38
References
2012
Year
PsychopharmacologyPharmacotherapyDrug ScreeningDrug ClassSocial SciencesBioanalysisDrug TestToxicologyAnalytical ChemistryDrug MonitoringClinical ChemistryPrescription AtssLaboratory MedicineDrug SafetyTherapeutic Drug MonitoringPsychoactive DrugAllergyOral Fluid ImmunoassaysOral FluidClub DrugPharmacologySubstance AbuseForensic ToxicologyDrug TestingMedicineDrug DiscoveryDrug Analysis
Introduction: The use of oral fluid for monitoring drug consumption on roads has many advantages over conventional biological fluids; therefore, several immunoassays have been developed for this purpose. In this work, the ability of 3 commercial immunoassays to detect amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs) in oral fluid was assessed. In addition, it was reviewed the main controlled ATSs available worldwide, as well as the oral fluid immunological screening tests that have been used for identifying ATSs in drivers. Materials and Methods: The analytical specificity of amphetamine direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), methamphetamine direct ELISA (Immunalysis Corporation), and Oral-View saliva multidrug of abuse test (Alfa Scientific Designs) was evaluated using ATS-spiked oral fluid. Legislation and published articles that report the use of immunological screening tests to detect ATS consumption in conductors were reviewed, including the kit's technical information, project reports, police and drug databases. Results and Discussion: Even at high concentrations, the tested assays were not able to detect methylphenidate, fenproporex, or diethylpropion, controlled ATSs legally marketed in many countries. Conclusions: This evidences the need to develop new kits that enable one to control the misuse of prescription ATSs on roads through oral fluid immunoassays.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1