2009 · 32 citations · 30 references
Natural ResourcesHydrologyCatchment HydrologyHydrologic ForecastingHydrologic ModelingFlood ForecastingRainfall-runoff AnalysisRainfall-runoff ModelingReal-time ForecastingAntecedent Moisture EstimationAntecedent Soil MoistureContinuous Rainfall-runoff ModellingEvent-based Flood ModelingEvent-based ForecastingHydrological ModellingRiver Flood ForecastingSoil Moisture Accounting
Abstract. This paper compares event-based and continuous hydrological modelling approaches for real-time forecasting of river flows. Both approaches are compared using a lumped hydrologic model (whose structure includes a soil moisture accounting (SMA) store and a routing store) on a data set of 178 French catchments. The main focus of this study was to investigate the actual impact of soil moisture initial conditions on the performance of flood forecasting models and the possible compensations with updating techniques. The rainfall runoff model assimilation technique we used does not impact the SMA component of the model but only its routing part. Tests were made by running the SMA store continuously or on event basis, everything else being equal. The results show that the continuous approach remains the reference to ensure good forecasting performances. We show, however, that the possibility to assimilate the last observed flow considerably reduces the differences in performance. Last, we present a robust alternative to initialize the SMA store where continuous approaches are impossible because of data availability problems.
30
Operational testing of hydrological simulation models
V. Klemeš · Hydrological Sciences Journal · 1986 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall–runoff model?
Ludovic Oudin, Frédéric Hervieu, Claude Michel et al. · Journal of Hydrology · 2004 · 1.2K citations
Robert E. Moore · Hydrology and earth system sciences · 2007 · 556 citations · Full text