Publication | Closed Access
A Randomized Comparison Between Midazolam and Thiopental for Elective Cesarean Section Anesthesia
21
Citations
0
References
1989
Year
NeonatologyMedicineRandomized Blind TrialPatient SafetyPediatricsAnesthesia PracticeMaternal HealthArm RecoilCaesarean SectionSurgeryGeneral Body ToneAnesthesiaPerioperative MedicineAnesthesiology
In a randomized blind trial, the general condition of 40 neonates was assessed following midazolam- or thiopental-based general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Among 19 neonatal neurobehavioral observations and tests, statistically significant differences between the midazolam and the thiopental groups were rare. However, a statistically significant interaction with regard to body temperature, general body tone, and arm recoil was observed where results were inferior for midazolam, although only within the first 2 hours. It was concluded that midazolam is as safe as thiopental for the induction and maintenance of elective cesarean section anesthesia in neonates.