Publication | Closed Access
A Comparison Among Nalbuphine, Meperidine, and Placebo for Treating Postanesthetic Shivering
51
Citations
20
References
1999
Year
Treating Postanesthetic ShiveringPostanesthetic ShiveringPharmacologyAnesthesia PracticeNeuropharmacologyIv Nalbuphine 0.08PharmacotherapyPain ManagementIv SalineAnesthesiaMedicineAnesthetic PharmacologyAnaesthetic AgentAnesthesiology
Postanesthetic shivering (PS) is distressing for patients and may induce a variety of complications.In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, we evaluated the value of nalbuphine, compared with meperidine and saline, for treating PS. Ninety adult patients were included in the study. Group 1 (n = 30) received IV nalbuphine 0.08 mg/kg, Group 2 (n = 30) received IV meperidine 0.4 mg/kg, and Group 3 (n = 30) received IV saline. Treatment that stopped shivering was considered to have been successful. The results demonstrated that, 5 min after treatment, both nalbuphine and meperidine provided a rapid and potent anti-shivering effect on PS, with high response rates of 80% and 83%, compared with those of saline (0%) (P < 0.01). Thirty minutes after injection, the response rates of nalbuphine and meperidine were 90% and 93%, respectively, compared with 17% in the saline group (P < 0.01). The differences between nalbuphine and meperidine were not significant. We conclude that nalbuphine may be an alternative to meperidine for treating PS. Implications: We evaluated nalbuphine versus meperidine and saline for treating postanesthetic shivering. Our results demonstrate that both nalbuphine and meperidine provide a similar rapid and potent anti-shivering effect. Nalbuphine may be an alternative to meperidine for treating postanesthetic shivering. (Anesth Analg 1999;88:686-9)
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1