2020 · 75 citations · 61 references
Systematic Literature StudyHealth PolicyPublication BiasesAccountingIntegrated ReportingRegistered Reports InitiativeNon-financial ReportingInformation ManagementResearch EthicsPublic HealthRegistered ReportsRapid PublicationScientific MisconductSurvey MethodologyReproducible ResearchPreregistration (Science)
Registered Reports are a form of empirical publication in which study proposals are peer reviewed and pre-accepted before research is undertaken. By deciding which articles are published based on the question, theory, and methods, Registered Reports offer a remedy for a range of reporting and publication biases. Here we reflect on the history, progress and future prospects of the Registered Reports initiative, and also offer practical guidance for authors, reviewers, and editors. We review early evidence that Registered Reports are working as intended, while at the same time acknowledging that they are not a universal solution for irreproducibility. We also consider how the policies and practices surrounding Registered Reports are changing, or must change in the future, to address limitations and adapt to new challenges. We conclude that Registered Reports are promoting reproducibility, transparency and self-correction across disciplines, and may help reshape how society evaluates research and researchers.
61
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Science · 2015 · 8.5K citations · Full text
Reproducibility Studies, Behavioral Sciences, Negative Result +13
A manifesto for reproducible science
Marcus R. Munafò, Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy Bishop et al. · Nature Human Behaviour · 2017 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Promoting an open research culture
Brian A. Nosek, George Alter, George C. Banks et al. · Science · 2015 · 2.7K citations · Full text
Culture, Open Access, Education +10
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Per O. Seglen · BMJ · 1997 · 2.5K citations
Reliability, Altmetrics, Engineering +13