Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

On the Deformation of Algebra Morphisms and Diagrams

16

Citations

9

References

1983

Year

Abstract

A diagram here is a functor from a poset to the category of associative algebras. Important examples arise from manifolds and sheaves. A diagram A has functorially associated to it a module theory, a (relative) Yoneda cohomology theory, a Hochschild cohomology theory, a deformation theory, and two associative algebras A! and (#A)!. We prove the Yoneda and Hochschild cohomologies of A to be isomorphic. There are functors from A-bimodules to both A!-bimodules and (#A)!bimodules which, in the most important cases (e.g., when the poset is finite), induce isomorphisms of Yoneda cohomologies. When the poset is finite every deformation of (#A)! is induced by one of A; if A also takes values in commutative algebras then the deformation theories of (#A)! and A are isomorphic. We conclude the paper with an example of a noncommutative projective variety. This is obtained by deforming a diagram representing projective 2-space to a diagram of noncommutative algebras. 0. Introduction. There is a striking similarity between the formal aspects of the deformation theories of complex manifolds and associative algebras. In this work we link the two with a deformation theory for diagrams and prove a Cohomology Comparison Theorem (CCT) which partially explains the analogy. The CCT enables one to show-among other things-that the deformation theory of a diagram associated to a compact manifold is isomorphic to that of a certain associative algebra. The assignment diagram ~ algebra is functorial while manifold ~* diagram is not. (The CCT has much wider applications; for example, we sketch here ( 7), and will discuss in detail in a later paper, its application to simplicial cohomology.) Here are the basic definitions:

References

YearCitations

Page 1