Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2002 · 323 citations · 31 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineOncologyBreast OncologyMolecular ImagingOncologic ImagingBreast Cancer ImagingCancer BiomarkersCellular UptakePositron Emission TomographyTumor CharacterizationTumor Imaging18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Imaging18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyBreast Positron Emission TomographyFluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyMitotic Activity AssessmentRadionuclide Uptake QuantificationTumor Uptake MechanismsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor
PURPOSE: Variable uptake of the glucose analog 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been noticed in positron emission tomography (PET) studies of breast cancer patients, with low uptake occurring especially in lobular cancer. At present, no satisfactory biologic explanation exists for this phenomenon. This study compared 18 FDG uptake in vivo with biomarkers expected to be involved in the underlying biologic mechanisms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative 18 FDG-PET scans were performed in 55 patients. 18 FDG activity was assessed visually by three observers using a four-point score. Tumor sections were stained by immunohistochemistry for glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1); Hexokinase (HK) I, II, and III; macrophages; hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alfa (HIF-1α); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF 165 ); and microvessels. Mitotic activity index (MAI), amount of necrosis, number of lymphocytes, and tumor cells/volume were assessed. RESULTS: There were positive correlations between 18 FDG uptake and Glut-1 expression (P < .001), MAI (P = .001), amount of necrosis (P = .010), number of tumor cells/volume (P = .009), expression of HK I (P = .019), number of lymphocytes (P = .032), and microvessel density (r = .373; P = .005). HIF-1α, VEGF 165 , HK II, HK III, and macrophages showed no univariate correlation with 18 FDG. In logistic regression, however, HIF-1α and HK II added value to MAI and Glut-1. CONCLUSION: 18 FDG uptake in breast cancer is a function of microvasculature for delivering nutrients, Glut-1 for transportation of 18 FDG into the cell, HK for entering 18 FDG into glycolysis, number of tumor cells/volume, proliferation rate (also reflected in necrosis), number of lymphocytes (not macrophages), and HIF-1α for upregulating Glut-1. Together, these features explain why breast cancers vary in 18 FDG uptake and elucidate the low uptake in lobular breast cancer.
31
Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis — Correlation in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Noel Weidner, Joseph P. Semple, William R. Welch et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1991 · 5.7K citations
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +15
THE METABOLISM OF TUMORS IN THE BODY
Otto Warbürg, Franz Wind, Erwin Negelein · The Journal of General Physiology · 1927 · 4.4K citations · Full text
Gregg L. Semenza, G.L. Wang · Molecular and Cellular Biology · 1992 · 2.4K citations · Full text