Physical review. B, Condensed matter · 1989 · 55 citations · 16 references
Natural SciencesChemistryPhysicsOptical MaterialsQuantum ChemistryTheoretical ChemistryMolecular Excited StatesMolecular Orbital TheoryMolecular SimulationMolecular SymmetryNonlinear Optical MaterialsNonlinear OpticsCharge SeparationConjugated MoleculesExcited Electronic StatesExcited StatesNonlinear Optical PropertiesOptical NonlinearityOptical PropertiesOrganic Nonlinear Optical Materials
We have developed a way to control the wave function to improve the second-order optical nonlinearity in organic materials. We simulated second-order hyperpolarizability \ensuremath{\beta} of four types of molecules with a polydiacetylene structure with donor and acceptor substitutions with the Austin Model 1 method of Dewar et al. [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3902 (1985)]. To improve \ensuremath{\beta} by wave-function control, the transition dipole moment ${r}_{\mathrm{gn}}$ and dipole-moment difference \ensuremath{\Delta}r between the ground and excited states must be optimized simultaneously by controlling the charge separation of the wave function by adjusting conjugated lengths and donor- and acceptor-substitution sites. We expect a maximum second-order hyperpolarizability per unit molecular length of about 3000\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}30}$ esu/(10 A\r{}) at a detuning energy of 0.2 eV, which corresponds to an electro-optic coefficient >100${r}_{33}$(${\mathrm{LiNbO}}_{3}$). The sharpening absorption band should induce an exceptionally large electro-optic coefficient >10 000${r}_{33}$(${\mathrm{LiNbO}}_{3}$).
16
Optical Nonlinearities in One-Dimensional-Conjugated Polymer Crystals
C. Sauteret, J.P. Hermann, R. Frey et al. · Physical Review Letters · 1976 · 624 citations
Natural Sciences, Chemistry, Physics +17