The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2011 · 37 citations · 10 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyAntimicrobial ResistanceBacteriologyMedical MicrobiologyAntibiotic ResistanceAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingBacterial EpidemiologyBacterial InfectionsResistance In Gram-negative BacteriaResistance SurveillanceAntibacterial Susceptibility TestingAntibiotic Sensitivity TestingAntibiotic Susceptibility TestingAntimicrobial Resistance MonitoringEpidemiology Of Bacterial InfectionsExtended-spectrum Beta-lactamase Producing OrganismsExtended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing OrganismsResistance In Clinical Isolates
OBJECTIVES: This analysis of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) evaluated the susceptibility patterns of Enterobacteriaceae in Latin America in 2008, with emphasis on susceptibility trends of E. coli and K. pneumoniae. METHODS: Clinical isolates were recovered from intra-abdominal infections (IAI) from 23 centers in 10 Latin American countries. Isolates were sent to a central laboratory for confirmation of identification, antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL testing, following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. RESULTS: Of 1,003 Gram-negative bacilli collected from intra-abdominal infections, E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the most commonly isolated organisms, and 26.8% of E. coli and 37.7% of K. pneumoniae were ESBL positive. Ertapenem and imipenem were the most consistently active agents tested; 99% of ESBLpositive E. coli isolates were susceptible to ertapenem and 100% to imipenem as well, and 91% of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae were susceptible to ertapenem and 98% to imipenem. Quinolones and cephalosporins were less active, achieving 1.5% to 76% inhibition against ESBL-producing E. coli and 3.5% to 61% inhibition against K. pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Local and unit-specific surveillance data is particularly important for selection of empiric therapy and in community-acquired infections as they can help the clinician with antibiotic selection by providing guidance regarding the likely pathogens and their resistance profiles. Our data also confirm the increasing frequency with which ESBL-producing organisms are found in the community setting, with 31.4% of communityacquired and 24.9% of hospital-acquired infections found to produce ESBLs. Imipenem and ertapenem are the most active agents tested for ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae.
10
Douglas J. Biedenbach, Gary J. Moet, Ronald N. Jones · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · 2004 · 425 citations
Stephen Hawser, Samuel K. Bouchillon, Daryl J. Hoban et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2009 · 223 citations · Full text
R. R. Reinert, Donald E. Low, F. Rossi et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2007 · 188 citations · Full text
David L. Paterson, Flávia Rossi, Fernando Baquero et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2005 · 185 citations