Nursing Research · 1994 · 126 citations · 0 references
MedicinePhysical MedicineUrologyExercise TestingFemale UrologyUrodynamicsContinence AssessmentFemale UrodynamicsPelvic Floor DisordersUrinary Continence AssessmentUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence AssessmentCorrelationElectromyographyIncontinence Severity MeasurementInterrater AgreementInterrater ReliabilityLeakagePelvic Floor Muscle Function AssessmentPelvic Floor Pressure Measurement
This article reports further experience with a Version 2 digital test performed on 208 community-residing women, 25 to 87 years old. Test-retest (n = 208) and interrater reliability (n = 36) scores for pressure, displacement, and duration were r = .54, .51, and .53 and r = .67, .73, and .55, respectively. Interrater reliability percentage agreement figures were exact for 94% of the women on pressure and 67% on displacement. With duration permitted to vary by 1 second, agreement was 75%. Validity was tested using vaginal electromyography score with correlation coefficients ranging from .37 to .63. A weak but significant correlation was found between the digital score and the stand-up test pad gain (r = -.12). No significant relationship was found between the digital test and a history of being able to stop the urine stream or other leakage measures. To address limitations in Version 2, a third version of the digital scale is proposed.