The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 1997 · 98 citations · 2 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsOral AnatomyPhoneticsPhonologyArticulatory PhoneticsLaryngeal AnatomyOral Cavity AnatomyTongue AnatomyArticulatory-acoustic RelationsInter-subject VariabilityPharyngeal MorphologySpeech OrgansTalker VariabilityTongue ShapeVocal Tract ModelingVocal Tract Shaping
The vocal tract during the production of [ɹ] appears to be characterized by three cavities due to the presence of two supraglottal constrictions: the primary one in the oral cavity, and a secondary one in the pharyngeal cavity. The study investigates tongue‑shaping mechanisms for these sounds and their acoustic implications. The authors use MRI of four native American English talkers producing [ɹ] to measure vocal‑tract dimensions and analyze 3‑D vocal‑tract and tongue shapes, and employ electropalatography contact profiles to examine inter‑ and intra‑talker variability. All subjects exhibit a large anterior volume due to an inward‑drawn, convex‑cross‑section tongue body, with inter‑subject variability in oral‑constriction location and formation, yet no systematic differences are observed between the 3‑D vocal‑tract and tongue shapes of word‑initial and syllabic [ɹ]s.
Magnetic resonance images of the vocal tract during sustained production of [ɹ] by four native American English talkers are employed for measuring vocal-tract dimensions and for morphological analysis of the 3D vocal tract and tongue shapes. Electropalatography contact profiles are used for studying inter- and intra-talker variabilities. The vocal tract during the production of [ɹ] appears to be characterized by three cavities due to the presence of two supraglottal constrictions: the primary one in the oral cavity, and a secondary one in the pharyngeal cavity. All subjects show a large volume anterior to the oral constriction, which results from an inward-drawn tongue body, an anterior tongue body that is characterized by convex cross sections, and a concave posterior tongue body shape. Inter-subject variabilities are observed in the oral-constriction location and the way the constriction is formed. No systematic differences are found between the 3-D vocal tract and tongue shapes of word-initial and syllabic [ɹ]s. Tongue-shaping mechanisms for these sounds and their acoustic implications are discussed.
2