The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model

D. Y. Lin, L. J. Wei

Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1989 · 380 citations · 0 references

Concepts

TL;DR

In misspecified Cox models, the maximum partial likelihood estimator converges to a constant vector β*, and a robust sandwich‑type covariance estimator is proposed that can be meaningfully interpreted. The study derives the asymptotic distribution of the maximum partial likelihood estimator β for regression coefficients in a possibly misspecified Cox proportional hazards model. Inference is performed by applying the asymptotic theory of β and related score‑statistic results to obtain valid tests and interval estimates. The estimator is asymptotically normal with consistently estimable covariance, and the proposed robust tests and intervals perform well even in small samples, whereas conventional model‑based procedures exhibit inflated type I error and poor coverage.

Abstract

Abstract We derive the asymptotic distribution of the maximum partial likelihood estimator β for the vector of regression coefficients β under a possibly misspecified Cox proportional hazards model. As in the parametric setting, this estimator β converges to a well-defined constant vector β*. In addition, the random vector n 1/2(β – β*) is asymptotically normal with mean 0 and with a covariance matrix that can be consistently estimated. The newly proposed robust covariance matrix estimator is similar to the so-called "sandwich" variance estimators that have been extensively studied for parametric cases. For many misspecified Cox models, the asymptotic limit β* or part of it can be interpreted meaningfully. In those circumstances, valid statistical inferences about the corresponding covariate effects can be drawn based on the aforementioned asymptotic theory of β and the related results for the score statistics. Extensive studies demonstrate that the proposed robust tests and interval estimation procedures are appropriate for practical use. In particular, the robust score tests perform quite well even for small samples. In contrast, the conventional model-based inference procedures often lead to tests with supranominal size and confidence intervals with rather poor coverage probability.