2020 · 161 citations · 93 references
Natural ResourcesEarth SciencesHydrologyHydrologic ModelingHydrometeorologyMachine LearningHydrological ModelingHydrometeorological ModelingPredictionScientific Prediction
The hydrological sciences community is increasingly interested in machine learning, yet it still relies on subjective, evidence‑poor process‑based models that have failed to yield accurate theory or predictions, as highlighted in a keynote at Google’s 2020 Flood Forecasting Meets Machine Learning Workshop. The paper urges hydrologists to quantitatively assess when process understanding adds value amid the machine‑learning‑dominated modeling landscape. They outline potential perspectives and preliminary examples to guide such quantitative evaluation. Deep‑learning rainfall‑runoff experiments reveal that large‑scale hydrological datasets contain far more information than has been incorporated into existing theory or models.
Abstract This paper is derived from a keynote talk given at the Google's 2020 Flood Forecasting Meets Machine Learning Workshop. Recent experiments applying deep learning to rainfall‐runoff simulation indicate that there is significantly more information in large‐scale hydrological data sets than hydrologists have been able to translate into theory or models. While there is a growing interest in machine learning in the hydrological sciences community, in many ways, our community still holds deeply subjective and nonevidence‐based preferences for models based on a certain type of “process understanding” that has historically not translated into accurate theory, models, or predictions. This commentary is a call to action for the hydrology community to focus on developing a quantitative understanding of where and when hydrological process understanding is valuable in a modeling discipline increasingly dominated by machine learning. We offer some potential perspectives and preliminary examples about how this might be accomplished.
93
Sepp Hochreiter, Jürgen Schmidhuber · Neural Computation · 1997 · 98.1K citations
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Marie Boas Hall, Thomas Kühn · The American Historical Review · 1963 · 7.6K citations
The Global Land Data Assimilation System
Matthew Rodell, Paul R. Houser, U. Jambor et al. · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2004 · 5.7K citations · Full text
Dennis Baldocchi, Eva Falge, Lianhong Gu et al. · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2001 · 4K citations · Full text
The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission
Dara Entekhabi, E. G. Njoku, Peggy O’Neill et al. · Proceedings of the IEEE · 2010 · 3.7K citations · Full text