Publication | Closed Access
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Restylane Versus Zyplast for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
178
Citations
10
References
2003
Year
Regenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringHyaluronic Acid GelHyaluronic AcidTopical DrugOrthopaedicsSkin SubstituteScar PreventionMulticenter ComparisonSurgeryNasolabial FoldsRestylane Versus ZyplastDermatologyBovine CollagenSoft Tissue ReconstructionMedicineOrthopaedic Surgery
Bovine collagen is widely used for facial soft tissue augmentation but offers only temporary correction and can trigger hypersensitivity reactions. The study compared the efficacy and safety of nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane) with bovine collagen (Zyplast) for correcting nasolabial folds in 138 patients. Patients received repeated injections every two weeks until optimal cosmetic result, with outcomes evaluated by a blinded investigator at 2, 4, and 6 months. At 6 months, hyaluronic acid gel was judged superior to bovine collagen in 56.9% of patients on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale and 62.0% on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, with similar local reaction rates, indicating more durable improvement and comparable tolerability.
Bovine collagen is extensively used for facial soft tissue augmentation but provides only temporary correction and can cause hypersensitivity reactions. Hyaluronic acid derivatives potentially offer improved longevity of correction and a reduced risk of immunogenicity and hypersensitivity.To compare the efficacy and safety of nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane; Q-Med, Uppsala, Sweden) with that of bovine collagen (Zyplast) for treatment of nasolabial folds.One hundred thirty-eight patients with prominent nasolabial folds were randomized to treatment with hyaluronic acid gel and bovine collagen on contralateral sides of the face. Treatments were repeated at 2-week intervals, as required, to achieve "optimal cosmetic result" (baseline). Outcomes were evaluated by a blinded investigator at 2, 4, and 6 months after baseline.Less injection volume was required for "optimal cosmetic result" with hyaluronic acid gel than with bovine collagen, and patients and investigators judged hyaluronic acid gel to be more effective in maintaining cosmetic correction. The investigator-based Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale assessments at 6 months after baseline indicated that hyaluronic acid gel was superior in 56.9% and 62.0% of patients, respectively, whereas bovine collagen was superior in 9.5% and 8.0% of patients, respectively. The frequency, intensity, and duration of local injection-site reactions were similar for the two products.Nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid provides a more durable aesthetic improvement than bovine collagen and is well tolerated.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1