Publication | Open Access
Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; Part 2: Free Thyroxine and Free Triiodothyronine
134
Citations
19
References
2010
Year
Most AssaysCalibration TraceabilityFree ThyroxineIodine Deficiency DisordersBioanalysisParathyroid HormoneBiostatisticsAnalytical ChemistryClinical ChemistryPublic HealthLaboratory MedicineHuman MetabolismNuclear MedicineThyroid PhysiologyThyroid FunctionIfcc Working GroupPart 2Thyroid DiseaseMass SpectrometryThyroid DisordersThyroid HormoneMedicine
Background: Free thyroxine (FT4) and free triiodothyronine (FT3) measurements are useful in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of thyroid disorders. The IFCC Scientific Division established a Working Group to resolve issues of method performance to meet clinical requirements. Methods: We compared results for measurement of a panel of single donor sera using clinical laboratory procedures based on equilibrium dialysis–isotope dilution–mass spectrometry (ED-ID-MS) (2 for FT4, 1 for FT3) and immunoassays from 9 manufacturers (15 for FT4, 13 for FT3) to a candidate international conventional reference measurement procedure (cRMP) also based on ED-ID-MS. Results: For FT4 (FT3), the mean bias of 2 (4) assays was within 10% of the cRMP, whereas for 15 (9) assays, negative biases up to –42% (–30%) were seen; 1 FT3 assay was positively biased by +22%. Recalibration to the cRMP eliminated assay-specific biases; however, sample-related effects remained, as judged from difference plots with biologic total error limits. Correlation coefficients to the cRMPs ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 0.92 to 0.78 (0.88 to 0.30). Within-run and total imprecision ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 1.0% to 11.1% (1.8% to 9.4%) and 1.5% to 14.1% (2.4% to 10.0%), respectively. Approximately half of the manufacturers matched the internal QC targets within ∼5%; however, within-run instability was observed. Conclusions: The study showed that most assays had bias largely correctable by establishing calibration traceability to a cRMP and that the majority performed well. Some assays, however, would benefit from improved precision, within-run stability, and between-run consistency.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1