The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · 1991 · 35 citations · 0 references
Physical ActivityNeuromuscular CoordinationMovement BiomechanicsStrength TrainingUpper Body StrengthRm Bench PressKinesiologyBody MassExercisePhysical ExerciseApplied PhysiologySport PhysiologyLean Body MassHealth SciencesPhysical MedicinePhysical FitnessClinical Exercise PhysiologyMusculoskeletal FunctionRehabilitationExercise ScienceExercise PhysiologyMusculoskeletal InteractionHuman MovementMedicine
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using push-ups to predict one-repetition maximum (1 RM) concentric bench press performance. College males (n = 106 enrolled in a basic fitness course were evaluated for a 1 RM bench press with free weights and for maximum one-minute push-up performance. Push-ups were adjusted for body height (PU·cm), body mass (PU·kg), lean body mass (PU·kg LBM) and height and body mass (PU·cm·kg·100−1). Push-ups were only moderately related (r = 0.47) to bench press. The correlations between adjusted push-ups and bench press were r = 0.49 (PU·cm), r = 0.71(PU·kg), r = 0.65 (PU·kg LBM) and r = 0.71 (PU·cm·kg·100−1). Cross-validation (n = 53) of the prediction equation developed from the original sample (PU·kg) and the equation proposed by Dean et al. were moderately successful (r = 0.70 for both). However, the standard errors of estimate were ± 15.7 kg for each equation, although the Dean et al. equation significantly overestimated bench press performance. Because of the large error noted when predicting 1 RM bench press, push-ups are not an accurate reflection of upper body strength in young males.