BMC Cancer · 2022 · 12 citations · 13 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyGastrointestinal OncologyOncology PharmacotherapyCreatinine Clearance InterpretationGastrointestinal Cancer PharmacotherapyMonitoring In Renal ImpairmentRenal Function TestsCreatinine-based BiomarkersProtein-to-creatinine RatioTreatment Continuation DecisionsUrine Protein TestingVascular Endothelial Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor InhibitionVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ReceptorsVegfr Inhibitors
BACKGROUND: Monitoring proteinuria is important for the management of patients with cancer treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors (VEGF/Ri). Here we investigated the difference between the urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and a qualitative value test (QV) on the decision making of treatment continuation and the usefulness of UPCR testing in patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with anti-VEGF/Ri. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2018, a survey was conducted based on the medical records of patients with gastrointestinal cancer with a QV of ≥2+ during the use of anti-VEGF/Ri at seven Japanese institutions participating in the Onco-nephrology Consortium. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the worst UPCR < 2.0 (low UPCR) in cases with a QV2+ at the point of the first proteinuria onset. The secondary endpoints were a comparison of low UPCR and worst UPCR ≥2.0 (high UPCR), the concordance rate between UPCR and QV in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading, and the differences in the decision making for anti-VEGF/Ri continuation. RESULTS: Among the 71 patients enrolled, the proportion of low UPCR in onset QV2+ (n = 53) was 66% (n = 35). In a comparison between low (n = 36) and high UPCR cases (n = 24), body weight (P = 0.036), onset QV status (P = 0.0134), and worst QV status (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with UPCR levels. The concordance rate for CTCAE Grade 2 of both the QV and UPCR was 83%. Regarding the judgment of anti-VEGF/Ri continuation, treatment was continued in 42.4% of cases when the QV became 3+, whereas only 25% continued treatment when the UPCR value became high. CONCLUSION: Urine dipstick test results may overestimate proteinuria, and the UPCR result tended to be more critical than the QV when deciding the treatment policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a multiple institutional retrospectively registered observational trial. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (protocol ID UMIN000042545 ).
13
Index for rating diagnostic tests
W. J. Youden · Cancer · 1950 · 11.5K citations · Full text
Education, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement +11
Leonard B. Saltz, Stephen Clarke, Eduardo Díaz‐Rubio et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +12
H. Wilke, Kei Muro, Eric Van Cutsem et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2014 · 2.5K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +13
Eric Van Cutsem, Josep Tabernero, Radek Lakomý et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2012 · 1.4K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Josep Tabernero, Takayuki Yoshino, Allen Lee Cohn et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2015 · 955 citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +12