Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · 2022 · 19 citations · 32 references
ComputingBiostatisticsOncologyMachine LearningStatistical LearningSurvival AnalysisCancer Survival AnalysisDecision TreesEnsemble MethodsPrognostic AssessmentSupport Vector MachinesSurvival PredictionBreast Cancer PrognosisGradient BoostingLogistic RegressionMachine Learning Prediction ModelsPrediction ModelsPrognostic PredictionPrognostic Tumor MarkersSurvival Rates
Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed female disorders globally. Numerous studies have been conducted to predict survival markers, although the majority of these analyses were conducted using simple statistical techniques. In lieu of that, this research employed machine learning approaches to develop models for identifying and visualizing relevant prognostic indications of breast cancer survival rates. A comprehensive hospital-based breast cancer dataset was collected from the National Cancer Institute’s SEER Program’s November 2017 update, which offers population-based cancer statistics. The dataset included female patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2010 with infiltrating duct and lobular carcinoma breast cancer (SEER primary cites recode NOS histology codes 8522/3). The dataset included nine predictor factors and one predictor variable that were linked to the patients’ survival status (alive or dead). To identify important prognostic markers associated with breast cancer survival rates, prediction models were constructed using <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>K</a:mi> </a:math> -nearest neighbor (K-NN), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), AdaBoost, logistic regression (LR), voting classifier, and support vector machine (SVM). All methods yielded close results in terms of model accuracy and calibration measures, with the lowest achieved from logistic regression ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mtext>accuracy</c:mtext> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>80.57</c:mn> <c:mtext> </c:mtext> <c:mtext>percent</c:mtext> </c:math> ) and the greatest acquired from the random forest ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mtext>accuracy</e:mtext> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>94.64</e:mn> <e:mtext> </e:mtext> <e:mtext>percent</e:mtext> </e:math> ). Notably, the multiple machine learning algorithms utilized in this research achieved high accuracy, suggesting that these approaches might be used as alternative prognostic tools in breast cancer survival studies, especially in the Asian area.
32
Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis
Filippo Amato, Alberto Botana López, Eladia María Peña‐Méndez et al. · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · 2013 · 905 citations · Full text
Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: A Report after Ten Years of a Clinical Trial
H. J. B. Atkins, J.L. Hayward, Darren Klugman et al. · BMJ · 1972 · 431 citations · Full text