Journal of Neuroendocrinology · 2022 · 12 citations · 24 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineOncologyEndocrine OncologyRadionuclide TherapyTherapeutic Nuclear MedicineMalignant NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine Tumor TherapyNeuroendocrine TumorsPeptide Receptor Radionuclide TherapyRadiation TherapyResponse AssessmentNeuroendocrine Liver MetastasisNeuroendocrine Tumor GradingPeptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ImagingRadionuclide Therapy SafetyRadiotracers Targeting Somatostatin ReceptorsSomatostatin Receptor TherapyWell-differentiated Neuroendocrine TumorsWell-differentiated Tumors
Lutetium peptide receptor radio nuclide therapy (Lu-PRRT) is an effective treatment for progressive, metastatic, somatostatin-receptor-positive, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (WD-NETs). Here, we report a single centre experience of real-world efficacy, long-term side effects, and challenges of this treatment. This was a retrospective analysis. All patients linked with our centre who had Lu-PRRT were included. Clinicopathological data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression. A total of 45 patients had Lu-PRRT, of those 30 (67%) were males, and 13 (29%) were more than 65 years old. The primary site was small intestine in 30 (67%) patients, pancreas in seven (16%) patients, and lung in three (7%) patients. The tumor was grade 1 in 15 (35%) patients, grade 2 in 22 (48%) patients, and grade 3 in six (13%) patients. A total of 41 (91%) patients had liver metastasis, and 20 (44%) patients had carcinoid syndrome. Lu-PRRT was the second-line therapy in all patients. Krenning's score was 4 in 36 (80%) patients and 3 in nine (20%) patients. The median waiting time to start Lu-PRRT therapy was 87 days. The median follow-up was 41 months. A total of 23 (51%) patients had a partial response, 18 (40%) patients had stable disease, and four (9%) patients had progression. None of the patients had a complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38 months (95% CI: 25.8-50.1). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Nine patients died during follow-up (death from any cause). Prior treatment with targeted therapies or high dose somatostatin analogues were negative predictors of Lu-PRRT outcome (p-values of < .001 and < .045, respectively). There were two serious haematological toxicities, one patient developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and the other developed chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Lu-PRRT is an effective second-line treatment for metastatic WD-NETs. The effect of targeted therapies on Lu-PRRT outcome was significant and needs to be clarified in further studies.
24
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system
Irıs D. Nagtegaal, Robert D. Odze, David S. Klimstra et al. · Histopathology · 2019 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Phase 3 Trial of <sup>177</sup> Lu-Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors
Jonathan Strosberg, Ghassan El‐Haddad, Edward M. Wolin et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2017 · 3.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Dik J. Kwekkeboom, Wouter W. de Herder, Boen L.R. Kam et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17